Legal Opinion
City of Thornton v. Teeter
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 1976No. 75-561PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
548 P.2d 133 (1976)
CITY OF THORNTON, and Division of State Compensation Insurance Fund, Petitioners,
v.
George TEETER, and Industrial Commission of Colorado, Respondents.
No. 75-561.
Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.
March 11, 1976.
William J. Baum, Francis L. Bury, Robert S. Ferguson, Denver, for petitioners.
L. F. Butler, Lakewood, for respondent George Teeter.
J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Jean E. Dubofsky, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward G. Donovan, Louis L. Kelley, Asst. Attys. Gen., Denver, for respondent Industrial Commission.
Selected for Official Publication.
VanCISE, Judge.
This action involves an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. MilkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Industrial Commission v. RoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Edlund v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Yates v. Sinton DairyColorado Court of Appeals · 1994