Legal Opinion

Edlund v. Industrial Commission

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1986No. 85CA0582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERMAN, Judge.

Claimant, Patsy Edlund, seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Commission (Commission) which reopened her workmen’s compensation case and ordered that the full amount of claimant’s Public Employees’ Retirement Association (PERA) disability retirement benefits be used to offset the recovery of her permanent partial disability benefits. We affirm in part and set aside in part.

As a result of an industrial injury, claimant was awarded workmen’s compensation disability benefits in the amount of $16,835 pursuant to a final order by the Commission. No appeal was taken from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gregorich v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  2. Industrial Commission v. CutshallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Mantor v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. VelasquezColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. City of Thornton v. TeeterColorado Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. EdlundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Larimer County School District Poudre R-1 v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Larimer Cty. Sch. Dist. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'NColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API