Legal Opinion

State v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 19, 2010No. 99,463PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

Isaac Duncan seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming his upward durational departure sentence ordered after a plea agreement. He argues the departure sentence is illegal because the trial court did not empanel a jury to determine whether aggravating factors existed to justify the upward departure as required by K.S.A. 21-4718 and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). The issue is whether Duncan waived the right to have a jury make this de termination. The Court of Appeals held…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. ShopteeseSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. KirtdollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. HankinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. State v. Bennett.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API