State v. Duncan
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Biles, J.:
Isaac Duncan seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming his upward durational departure sentence ordered after a plea agreement. He argues the departure sentence is illegal because the trial court did not empanel a jury to determine whether aggravating factors existed to justify the upward departure as required by K.S.A. 21-4718 and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). The issue is whether Duncan waived the right to have a jury make this de termination. The Court of Appeals held…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ShopteeseSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. KirtdollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- State v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. HankinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. Bennett.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.