NA KERSON CO., INC. v. Shayne
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the concurring memorandum of Mr. Justice Joseph A. Suozzi.
We would add only that plaintiffs proof, taken in its most favorable light, fails to establish a prima facie case of legal malpractice or fraud in connection with the execution of the stipulation of settlement of the prior action. Other than evidence of withdrawal of the second affirmative defense, the record is barren of any evidence that said defense would have altered the result of the prior action.
Chief Judge…
2Cited by53 opinions
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Carmel v. LunneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk & WardwellNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.