Legal Opinion

Valladares v. Stone

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1990No. C004308PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, J.

In this appeal from a judgment entered after the granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, 1 we hold that Civil Code section 846, which provides that an owner of any estate or interest in real property owes no duty of care to keep the premises safe for those who enter or use the property for recreational purposes without express invitation or payment of a fee, applies to a person who is injured while climbing and playing in a tree on a vacant lot in a residential neighborhood. 2

As discussed more fully below, the fact that tree climbing is not included in the list…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. RandolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. California Insrance Guarantee Ass'n v. Argonaut InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Alfred L. Mansion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. People v. SilverbrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Myers v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API