Legal Opinion

Keelen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1933No. 6556PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, suing on a war risk insurance policy, suffered an adverse verdiet. He appeals claiming that his motion for a directed verdiet should have been granted. He recognizes that it is ordinarily for the jury to say whether one suing on a war risk insurance policy became within the life of the policy, totally and permanently disabled, and that where the verdiet accords with any reasonable view of the evidence, it must be upheld. United States v. Irwin (C. C. A.) 61 F.(2d) 488; United States v. Martin (C. C. A.) 54 F. (2d) 554; United States v. Crume (C. C. A.) 54…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wise v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. CrumeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  3. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deadrich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Le Blanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Parrigan v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1933
  4. United States v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API