Legal Opinion
Nunlist v. Keleher
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1926No. 2980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
B1CKLEY, J.
The appellant (plaintiff) commenced suit against appellees (defendants.) to recover balance due on a written contract to furnish labor'and materials to do the steam heating in defendants’ building as per plans and specifications prepared by the contractor for the sum of $2,348. The contract was made by written proposal, which included standard conditions printed on the back thereof, together with a'written addition to paragraph 7 thereof, among which were the following:
“No. 1. Payments are to be made monthly on a basis of 90 per cent, of the value of the labor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emigrant Co. v. County of AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- International Textbook Co. v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Noyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Kinney v. Federal Laundry Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- O'Brien v. Liberty Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Price v. Van LintNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Arrow Gas Company of Dell City, Texas v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Walters v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Kelso v. KelsoDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1954
- Arrow Gas Company of Dell City, Texas v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.