Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants Donald and Ruth Bosold seek damages for the alleged decreased value of their townhouse arising from respondent Ban Con, Inc.’s (Ban Con) construction of a townhouse adjacent to theirs. The trial court granted Ban Con summary judgment on the basis that the Bosolds did not have a valid easement of view and that any contract to convey an easement of view was too indefinite to enforce and lacked consideration. The Bosolds appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 5, 1977, the Bosolds signed an agreement to purchase a townhouse that Ban Con was to build in Plymouth,…