Legal Opinion

Andrew Ludlum v. Department of Justice

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 28, 2002No. 01-3093PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1281Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge FRIEDMAN, in which Circuit Judge LINN joins. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA.

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI” or “Bureau”) removed Andrew Ludlum (“Ludlum”), one of its special agents, for lack of candor (and other improprieties) during an administrative inquiry. The Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) upheld the charge of lack of candor, but mitigated the removal penalty to a 120-day suspension. We affirm.

I

A. The basic facts are largely undisputed. While driving an official…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gerald L. Naekel v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bloom v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. McIntosh v. DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  3. Doe v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Blue v. PerciasepeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Parkinson v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API