Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Brennan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 23, 2016No. Civil Action No. 14-13380-PBSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Saris, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Diping Anderson was formerly employed as a Postal Police Officer (“PPO”) by the U.S. Postal Service. She claims that the Postal Service unlawfully terminated her on the basis of her Chinese descent and in retaliation for her filing multiple complaints of race discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”).
The Postal Service moves for summary judgment on the basis that it had a nondiscriminatory reason for terminating Anderson: a series of workplace misconduct incidents. Anderson responds that her workplace misconduct…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Olson v. ChaoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019