Legal Opinion
Grant v. National Acme Company
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 12, 1972No. Civ. A. 6107PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FOX, District Judge.
This is an action for recovery of damages for personal injury, founded upon the court’s diversity jurisdiction. At the time of injury, plaintiff Joe Grant was employed by Lakey Foundry Company as an operator of an edge blow core machine manufactured by defendant Demmler Manufacturing Company, presently a subsidiary of National Acme Company. Cenella Grant is a named party plaintiff, but her claims have been withdrawn.
Following a jury trial on plaintiff’s allegations of negligence and breach of implied warranty, a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Pippen v. Denison Division of Abex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- McNabb v. Green Real Estate Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.