Legal Opinion

MANZO v. City of Plainfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 30, 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This an action to recover property losses suffered during serious racial disturbances in the defendant City of Plainfield in July 1967. The many claims were pressed both on the thesis that defendant was negligent and on the thesis that defendant is liable under a statute relating to mobs and riots, N. J. 8. A. 2A:48-1 to 7. The case was tried before a jury with the stipulation that the trial judge would decide the negligence issue and the jury the liability issue under the statute. The trial judge found as a fact that defendant was not negligent. The jury determined that there was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. Fireman's Ins. Co. of NJSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dome Petroleum Limited v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company Of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Village of Ridgewood v. Shell OilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  3. City of Newark v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Deehl v. KnoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. R. L. Mulliken, Inc. v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API