Legal Opinion
R. L. Mulliken, Inc. v. City of Englewood
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 30, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cuelam.
This case involves four consolidated actions for property damage arising out of racial disturbances in the City of Englewood on July 21, 22 and 23, 1967. Judgments for plaintiffs were entered on jury verdicts. We certified defendant’s appeal before argument in the Appellate Division. The appeal was heard with the appeals in A. & B. Auto Stores of Jones Street, Inc. v. City of Newark, 59 N. J. 5, and Manzo v. City of Plainfield, 59 N. J. 30, both decided this day.
Defendant contends the mob and riot statute, N. J. S. A. 2A:48-1 to 7, is “anachronistic” and must fall on that account.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- A. & B. Auto Stores of Jones Street, Inc. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- MANZO v. City of PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Fusco v. Hale Furniture Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Berke v. Buckley Broadcasting Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Newark Superior Officers Ass'n v. NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.