Legal Opinion

Jubb v. Maslanka

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 13, 1961No. File 122259PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlau, J.

The most recent demurrer filed by the defendant, dated December 5, 1960, demurs to both the second and third counts of the complaint in so far as each purports to state a cause of action in nuisance, on the grounds that the complaint does not allege that the plaintiff was on the premises in the exercise of any public right, that the plaintiff was not injured in relation to the right which he enjoyed by reason of his ownership of an interest in the land, that the doctrine of “condition amounting to a nuisance” does not apply as between landlord and tenant, and that the liability of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webel v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Noebel v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Martel v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Collette v. PielaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ayala v. B & B Realty Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1974
  2. Fonseca v. LavadoConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  3. Gail v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Connecticut Superior Court · 1974
  4. Gesswin v. BeckwithConnecticut Superior Court · 1978
  5. Szponar v. Stasiak, No. Cv92 0452914s (Jul. 19, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API