Wallace v. Lawyer
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
The appellant commenced proceedings supplementary to execution against Peter Lawyer and Edward K. Hall, also making the board of commissioners of Hamilton county and Stillman' O. Montgomery, treasurer, defendants. His complaint contains two paragraphs, each of which is substantially as follows:
That on the 1st day of November, 1871, Joseph B. Randall recovered, in the superior court of Marion county, Indiana, a judgment against said Peter C. Lawyer and Edward K. Hall, for six hundred and ninety-two dollars and seventy-four cents, which, with interest and costs, remains wholly unpaid. That on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pendleton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Root ex rel. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Merwin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Burnham v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Mayor of Mobile v. Rowland & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1855
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- State ex rel. Summerfield v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Waterbury v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1891
- Burdge v. BolinIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.