Legal Opinion
Hill v. Town of Conway
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 4, 1999No. 99-1019PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLAK, District Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the District Court for the District of New Hampshire was correct in dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, brought by plaintiffs, as owners of the Mountain Valley Mall in North Conway, New Hampshire, against the Town of Conway (“Town”). In their § 1983 suit plaintiffs have alleged that the Town effectuated an uncompensated' — and hence unconstitutional — “taking” of Mountain Valley Mall Boulevard, an access road connecting Mountain Valley Mall to U.S. 302, a major highway.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- New England Power & Marine, Inc. v. Town of Tyngsborough (In Re Middlesex Power Equipment & Marine, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Gonzalez-Morales v. Hernandez-ArencibiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Richard Pieper v. American Arbitration Association, Inc. R. Jeffrey Pollock Gerald HamblyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Maymó-Meléndez v. Álvarez-RamírezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Maymo-Melendez v. Alvarez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.