United States v. Barletta
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
The government seeks a pretrial ruling as to the admissibility of a certain tape recording at the retrial of this multi-count indictment. The government’s motion to that effect was denied by this court on March 25, 1980. A timely notice of appeal was filed by the government. The defendant subsequently filed a motion, pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 10(e), seeking clarification of this court’s order of denial. This memorandum is in response to that request for clarification.
I
The tape recording in issue is of a telephone conversation between the defendant and a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Charles B. Bradley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. John R. Barletta, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. John R. BarlettaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. BarlettaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
- United States v. BarlettaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981