United States v. John R. Barletta
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
The United States appeals from an order of a district court, 512 F.Supp. 220, refusing to admit into evidence in a criminal trial a tape recording of a conversation between the defendant and a government informant.
The procedural history of this matter is set forth in our prior opinion in this case, United States v. Barletta, 644 F.2d 50 (1st Cir. 1981), and the court’s subsequent reaf-firmance of the earlier order discussed in that opinion forms the technical basis for this appeal. The court’s reasons for excluding the tape, however, are most fully addressed in a published…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. John R. Barletta, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Daryl E. SingleterryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William T. MarlerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Lebron-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- People v. AguilarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.