Legal Opinion

City of New Orleans v. La Nasa

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 23, 1955No. 42328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

The defendants,' Dr. Joseph A. LaNasa, Mrs. Leola Dalton LaNasa, and Emblem, Inc., have appealed to this court from a judgment of the district court enjoining them from operating and using certain real *956■property in New Orleans for any commercial purposes whatever. The City of New Orleans sought the injunction on the ground •that the property in question was classified “B-Residential” under the city’s zoning laws, and that the property’s use was therefore restricted to residential purposes.

Appellee, the City of New Orleans, has filed in this court a motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Frierson v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. City of New Orleans v. RymanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Plauche v. AlbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  5. Harris v. PierceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. NoraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. City of New Orleans v. La NasaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Parish of Jefferson v. PacieraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Ragusa v. American Metal Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Eskine v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API