Legal Opinion

Harris v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 14, 1953No. 40045PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from violating certain restrictive covenants running with the land and affecting their property. They also seek to have the structures which violate the restrictive covenants removed or made to conform to the specifications of the covenants. From a judgment in favor of the defendants the plaintiffs have appealed.

There is no affirmative allegation or proof in the record that the amount in controversy or the right in contest exceeds the value of $2,000 exclusive of interest. This court will not entertain the appeal even though no motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plauche v. AlbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Thalheim v. GruhlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cloud v. DyessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Harris v. PierceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. City of New Orleans v. LangensteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. City of New Orleans v. La NasaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Brinson v. BrinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API