Kujek v. Goldman
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Johann August Kujek against Manassah L. Goldman, impleaded. From a judgment of the city court (25 ¡N. Y. Supp. 753) affirming a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
Though the defendant (appellant) on the trial denied his concubinage with the plaintiff’s wife, the paternity of the child born subsequent to the marriage, and the making of any representation of the woman’s chastity to induce the plaintiff to marry her, the testimony of the plaintiff and of his wife was abundant to establish the facts denied, and conspicuously denounced the denials as untrue. ¡Nor were the representations mere matter of opinion. The illicit relations which had subsisted between the defendant (appellant) and the woman endowed the former with personal knowledge of her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Knapp v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Schultz v. . SchultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Dyett v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Blaechinska v. Howard Mission & Home for Little WanderersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Patenaude v. PatenaudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Frankfurter v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Lefler v. FoxAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905