Legal Opinion

Park v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 25, 1973No. 7310SC73PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Appellants assign as error the trial court’s ruling that the devise of real property under item 4 of the will is a specific one. They contend that item 4 is a residuary devise of fealty and that the devisees taking thereunder should pay a pro rata share of federal estate taxes. We do not agree.

Appellants predicate their argument on the fact that the testator used the language — “[a] 11 real estate which remains at my death” (emphasis added), and the fact that item 4 is the last disposing clause in the will thereby occupying the “natural position” for a residuary devise.

In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. University v. . BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Buffaloe v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Nebel v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Shelby v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. FIRST NAT. BANK OF SHELBY v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Park v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API