Park v. Carroll
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Appellants assign as error the trial court’s ruling that the devise of real property under item 4 of the will is a specific one. They contend that item 4 is a residuary devise of fealty and that the devisees taking thereunder should pay a pro rata share of federal estate taxes. We do not agree.
Appellants predicate their argument on the fact that the testator used the language — “[a] 11 real estate which remains at my death” (emphasis added), and the fact that item 4 is the last disposing clause in the will thereby occupying the “natural position” for a residuary devise.
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- University v. . BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Buffaloe v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Nebel v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First National Bank of Shelby v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- FIRST NAT. BANK OF SHELBY v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Park v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973