Legal Opinion

Detona Sargent v. State of Ind., and the Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion Co., and the Indianapolis Metro Police Dept

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2015No. 49S02-1312-MI-790PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

On cross-motions for summary judgment the trial court deemed a vehicle forfeited and awarded the same to the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. However the undisputed facts disclose the vehicle’s owner is entitled to possession. 'We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Facts and Procedural History

The State of Indiana, the City of Indianapolis, and the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (collectively “the State”) filed a complaint against Detona Sargent seeking forfeiture of her 1996 Buick Century automobile worth approximately $1,700.00. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kroger Co. v. PlonskiIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Gray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Old National Bank v. Steven Kelly, Jon A. Cook, and Rebecca F. Cook, individually and on behalf of others similarly situatedIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Aaron A. Negash v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Luke Paul Eckrich v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Khalil Jalon Payne v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Robert R. Coulter, III and Kerri E. Coulter v. Philip J. Caviness, Rush County Prosecutor, on behalf of State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API