Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2002No. 00-5595PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) appeals the district court’s decision denying its motion for summary judgment and holding that State Farm was obliged to provide coverage and a defense to Christopher R. Wilson and his family for a civil damages claim arising out of an automobile accident. Based on recent developments in Kentucky case law, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND with instructions for the district court to enter judgment in favor of State Farm.

I. BACKGROUND

The events giving rise to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robert Campbell v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Powell-Walton-Milward, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. McKinneyKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  4. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,948 Carla Kurczi v. Eli Lilly and Company (96-4124) Dart Industries, Inc., F/k/a Rexall Drug Company (96-4127)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Healthwise of Kentucky, Ltd. v. AnglinKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Kanika DemblaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Gary Wayne Bushee v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API