State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Kanika Dembla
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Intervening defendant Kanika Dembla (“Dembla”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in .favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). The district court found no insurance coverage was available to Shaun Dunlap (“Shaun”), the driver of the vehicle that injured Dembla, under the State Farm policy at issue. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm.
I
In 2012, Shaun lived with his parents, George and Judy Dunlap. State Farm issued an automobile insurance policy (the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,948 Carla Kurczi v. Eli Lilly and Company (96-4124) Dart Industries, Inc., F/k/a Rexall Drug Company (96-4127)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Hirsch v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Card v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
- Pitt v. Tyree Organization Ltd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Moore v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allmerica Financial Benefit Insurance Company v. Eagle Sales Company, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CecilDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024