Legal Opinion

Heiser v. Loomis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Eaton. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOoolet, J.

Loomis sued Heiser in trespass for assault and battery. The evidence tended to show that, on the third day of August, 1877, Heiser with some other persons suddenly came upon the plaintiff, and with words such as, “I have got you where I want you now,” “"We’]! give you what you deserve,” proceeded to strike and kick him until he was seriously injured. On the cross-examination of the plaintiff, defendant sought to show that, on the previous *18Sunday evening in passing his house the plaintiff had stopped in front of it and used vile and abusive language to his wife. Eepeated questions put for this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Taylor v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  3. Gilbert v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Tomlinson v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  5. Chandler v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Siminoff v. Jas. H. Goodman & Co. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Galbraith v. FlemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hitchcock v. PrattMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Armstrong v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API