Legal Opinion

Danilo Konvalinka v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 26, 1961No. 15908_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of assault after trial in the Municipal Court. D.C. Code § 22-504 (1951). The Municipal Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Konvalinka v. United States, 1960, 162 A.2d 778. We granted leave to appeal. The contentions here urged are of the same nature as those presented to the Municipal Court of Appeals. After careful consideration, we have concluded that the testimony of the complaining witness was sufficiently corroborated, not only by his spontaneous declaration to a police of- fleer immediately after the alleged assault — constituting a measure of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Konvalinka v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Fitzgerald v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. In re L. A. G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Fitzgerald v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API