Legal Opinion

Ivory v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1902No. Sac. No. 936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought under the unlawful detainer act, to recover possession of the premises described in the complaint and damages for the unlawful withholding.

Plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendants appeal from the judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial.. The principal findings of the court are not questioned, hut it is claimed that the finding that plaintiff served written notice on the twenty-seventh day of January, 1900, for the purpose of terminating-the tenancy on March 1, 1900-, and demanding the surrender of the possession of the premises at said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Johnson v. ChelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Caulfield v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nork v. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Boucher v. St. GeorgeMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. American National Bank v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
  4. Richmond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. State Ex Rel. Hamshaw v. Justice CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API