Legal Opinion

Hennig v. Crosby Group, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1991No. 54584-7PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

In the fall of 1983, the Port of Seattle engaged Hurlen Construction Company (the employer) to rehabilitate Pier 91 in Seattle. The construction company used a crane to replace old pilings at the pier via "pigeon holes" opened through the deck of the pier. A new piling would be lifted over the "pigeon hole" while a "pile buck" would position the 90-foot, 3,000-pound pile into place. After positioning the piling, the pile buck would signal the crane operator to let the pile fall into the sediment under the pier. The "pile buck" would step away when the pile was released.

During the course of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Epperly v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Tauscher v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bozung v. Condominium Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Fardig v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kamla v. the Space Needle CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kamla v. Space Needle Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Dolan v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Phillips v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API