Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Perez v. Neven

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 11, 2020No. 2:14-cv-02087Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 GLADYS PEREZ, Case No. 2:14-cv-02087-APG-BNW 4 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. BRET WHIPPLE SHOULD NOT BE 5 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., HELD IN CONTEMPT 6 Respondents. (ECF No. 126) 7 8 9 This is a habeas corpus proceeding under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

brought by petitioner Gladys 10 Perez, a Nevada prisoner who is represented by counsel. Perez filed a Motion for Order to Show 11 Cause Regarding Discovery from Attorney Bret Whipple. ECF No. 126. The respondents do not 12 oppose this motion. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. In Re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litigation. Go-Video, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API