Pollard v. Gammon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Irrespective of whether the evidence is sufficient to authorize a finding that the railroad company had, in respect to an alleged defective coupler, been guilty of a failure to comply with the Federal safety-appliance act, and irrespective of whether the evidence authorized a finding that the defendant had failed to comply with the requirements thereof, the evidence authorized a finding for the plaintiff upon other alleged grounds of negligence.
It is contended by the defendant that the plaintiff was on the car, which had been kicked back and which had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Southern Railway Co. v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
3Cited by12 opinions
- Callaway v. PickardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Jones v. HutchinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Railway Express Agency Inc. v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Canal Insurance v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.