Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Fiegel

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided February 15, 1870PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for a new trial, on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCdnn, J.

After examining closely all the testimony taken on the trial in this case, I am prepared to say that a new trial should not be granted upon newly discovered evidence. I am well aware that trials at nisi prius could not subsist without the power somewhere to grant new trials. If an erroneous judgment is given on a question of law, there are many ways of reviewing it. When a judge commits error in examining questions of fact placed before him through depositions, affidavits, or the like, there are many ways by which he can be reviewed and set right; but a general verdict can only be corrected…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corley v. New York & Harlem RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Corley v. New York & Harlem RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. People v. BowersNew York Family Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API