Legal Opinion

Crossan v. Crossan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1939No. Civ. 6214PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEIRUP, J., pro tem .

Plaintiff was granted a divorce from defendant in the State of Nevada, and subsequently brought this action for a division of the community property. The trial court awarded to the plaintiff a .dwelling house and the household furniture therein, which it found to be of the net value of $1500. It gave to the defendant an insurance policy, an automobile, and a cabin which it found to be worth $806, and also an interest in the State Employees’ Retirement Fund o£ the value of $811.67, as found by the court. Defendant has appealed from the judgment.

The only question raised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cheney v. City & County of San Francisco Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Herring v. BlakeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API