Legal Opinion

Jawitz v. Reitman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 3, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event. It was error to direct a verdict. On the evidence, there were questions of fact for the jury whether the defendant was not entitled to hold possession for the unpaid purchase price. The defendant denied that the plaintiff had tendered the certified check and likewise denied that any credit was to be allowed for the sale of the property claimed to be owned by the plaintiff. Until the purchase price was paid or tender thereof made, the defendant had a lien. (Pers. Prop.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sinnott v. . FeiockNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Hickey v. HinsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Christie v. CorbettNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Calnan v. SternMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Mahr v. LivingstoneNew York Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cash v. DiamondCity of New York Municipal Court · 1955
  2. Watkins v. Madison County Trust & Deposit Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1930
  3. Bufter Amusement Corp. v. GarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API