Neuhoff Bros., Packers v. Acosta
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Norvell
The Court of Civil Appeals dismissed the attempted appeal of Neuhoff Bros., Packers, because an appeal bond was not timely filed. Neuhoff Bros., Packers v. Acosta, 319 S.W. 2d 416.
In determining the correctness of this action it is necessary to construe that part of Rule 356, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which reads as follows:
“Whenever a bond for costs on appeal is required, the bond shall be filed with the Clerk within thirty days after rendition of judgment or order overruling motion for new trial.”
The controlling question may be stated as follows:
In determining the time for filing an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peurifoy and Thomason v. WiebuschTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- P. G. Peurifoy v. G. W. WiebuschTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Thomason v. WiebuschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Neuhoff Bros., Packers v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
3Cited by24 opinions
- Oil Field Haulers Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Angelina County v. McFarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Buttery v. BettsTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Washington v. Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Horn v. Builders Supply Co. of Longview, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.