Legal Opinion

Gosnell v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1980No. 14674Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

This appeal arises out of a summary judgment granted in favor of plaintiff-ap-*122pellee, Robert E. Gosnell. Taking jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Civil Appellate Proc. Rules, rule 19(e), we reverse.

Appellee is the owner of certain real property located within the city of Phoenix. The realty was leased to various tenants from January 1974 to December 1976, and a Privilege License tax was paid upon the rental income. On July 20, 1977, appellee received a written Notice of Audit Assessment informing him that defendant-appellant, the City of Phoenix, had audited his accounts and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BohannanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Greater Arizona Savings and Loan Ass'n v. TangArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Elephant Butte Irr. Dist. of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Trustees of St. Paul Methodist Episcopal Church South v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API