Legal Opinion
Rogers v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided June 28, 1999No. Claim No. 88940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*684OPINION OF THE COURT
John P. Lane, J..Richard Rogers contends that he was unjustly convicted and imprisoned. The trial of his claim was bifurcated and this decision is limited to liability issues.
On June 21, 1990 claimant was indicted by the Grand Jury of Cattaraugus County on two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree. The indictment was tried on the theory that in June and July 1989 claimant obtained contract deposits in excess of $1,000 each from Robert Horton and Hobert Mason for whom he falsely promised to build pole barns. Following a trial in Cattaraugus County Court he was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. NormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Reed v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ivey v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lanza v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scheidelman v. Henderson (In Re Henderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- O'Donnell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2004
- Ramus v. BruwerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Rogers v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001