Legal Opinion

Morison v. Weik

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1912No. Civ. No. 1089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. M. Conley,. Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to have a certain deed, which purported to have been made by plaintiff to defendant Anna Ilmer Weik, canceled and annulled upon the ground that the signature thereto had been forged by defendants. The court upon ample evidence found that the instrument had been duly signed and executed by plaintiff, and accordingly gave judgment for defendants, from which, and an order denying her motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

The sole alleged error upon which appellant bases her claim for reversal is that the court, over plaintiff’s objection, permitted the introduction of evidence on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Ulm v. PratherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API