Legal Opinion
Dodge v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 2000No. D033834PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
In this case, we are asked to decide when the 60-day period under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 660 for ruling on a motion for new trial expired.
Section 660 gives the court power to rule on a new trial motion for “60 days from and after the mailing of notice of entry of judgment by the clerk of the court pursuant to [sjection 664.5 or 60 days from and after service on the moving party by any party of written notice of the entry of the judgment, whichever is earlier . . . .” If no notice of entry is either mailed by the clerk or served by a party, the period is extended:…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Van Beurden Insurance Services v. Customized Worldwide Weather Insurance AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Desherow v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kraft v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Palmer v. GTE California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Martinez v. FriedeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Collins v. Sutter Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Garibotti v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Conservatorship of the Person & Estate of TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.