Legal Opinion · Dissent

McFarland v. Beaton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1939No. 12534Published

1DissentYoung, Justice

I must respectfully enter my dissent to the majority opinion, holding generally that (1) a sale, exchange, or disposition of the estate by a community survivor, other than for the payment of debts, is a maladministration which the heirs can treat as a conversion, with a resultant right to sue the sureties for the value of their one-half interest. (2) I further dissent from the majority findings that the petition alleged the community survivor, Mrs. McFarland, had “lost all of said community estate in a manner not authorized by law”; that she “converted the entire community property in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hand v. ErringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. McGraw v. Merchants' & Planters' Nat. Bank of ShermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Brunson v. Yount-Lee Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ashbrook v. HammerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Moreman v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API