City of Wyandotte v. Drennan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The defendant in error was recorder of the city of Wyandotte during the years 1877 and 1878. Hej claims that he has never been paid in full Ms salary for) those years, and as the common council refused to allowj and pay Mm what he demanded, he brought suit in assumpsit^ to recover. j
By the city charter the recorder is elected for a term of two years. Laws 1867 vol. 2 p. 188. He is ex officio a justice of the peace for the city, with the usual powers and authority of justices; he is clerk of the common council, and is required to keep a record of their proceedings and an account of their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- BUTLER v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- State ex rel. Martin v. KalbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Chapoton v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mial v. Ellington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Attorney General ex rel. Rich v. JochimMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Cowell v. AyersTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. ChadwickOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Board of Commissioners v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.