Legal Opinion
Anaconda Company v. Ruckelshaus
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 19, 1972No. Civ. A. C-4362PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, Judge.
The matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction, and the controversy will have to be finally resolved when ripe for decision in final hearing on a permanent injunction. It is intended that this opinion serve as the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 52, and fact findings are set forth throughout the body of the opinion.
However, as a prefatory matter of housekeeping, although some of the enumerated facts are discussed more fully later herein, the following enumerated facts are found, based upon the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- City of Rochester v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Texter v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- The Anaconda Company, a Montana Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.