Legal Opinion
Cordero, Miranda & Pinto v. Winn
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided September 15, 1989No. Civ. 89-675 HLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAFFITTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Cordero, Miranda & Pinto, a Puerto Rico law firm, is suing their out of state clients, Charles E. Winn and Packaging & Engineering Corp., Inc., for failure to pay $8,000 in attorney’s fees, costs, disbursements and expenses incurred by the law firm in defending these defendants in a federal civil action. Plaintiff also claims that it is entitled to $5,000 for expenses and attorney’s fees that will be incurred in collecting the $8,000 originally owed. Plaintiff asserts jurisdiction under diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff moves the Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Norton Sarnoff and Carl Fletcher, and v. American Home Products Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Parsons Corporation v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Coggeshall Development Corp. v. William J. Diamond, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Recreation & Sports of Puerto Rico v. World Boxing Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Department of Recreation and Sports of Puerto Rico v. World Boxing Association, Julio Gervacio Lind v. World Boxing Association, Julio Gervacio, Julio Gervacio Lind v. World Boxing AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1996