Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Livingston

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1981No. 309PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Henry C. Livingston, Jr. has appealed from the lower court’s decision that he is not entitled to partition of all entireties property. The central issue for our determination is whether appellee wrongfully appropriated jointly held assets to the detriment of appellant, constituting a revocation of the estate of tenancy by the entireties, thereby subjecting all entireties property to partition at this time. The court below decided that appellee had used entireties property to support herself and to pay certain of her husband’s debts and had not wrongfully appropriated jointly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Stemniski v. StemniskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Reifschneider v. ReifschneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Vento v. VentoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Winpenny v. WinpennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Conrady v. ConradySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Goldstein v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Kincaid EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Crawford County · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API