Legal Opinion
Stupnicki v. Southern New York Fish & Game Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Isadore Bookstein, Off. Ref.
This action has been tried once before. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs was reversed on the facts, on the law and in the interest of justice, in order to afford defendant another opportunity to introduce evidence, which for one reason or another, Was not introduced upon the first trial.
The action is for an injunction to restrain defendant and its members from trespassing upon the lands of plaintiffs.
The issue has its genesis in the alleged abandonment of a portion of a town road and in the effect of such alleged abandonment.
The parties own adjacent parcels of land.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Treadwell v. . InsleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Mangam v. President & TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- People ex rel. De Groat v. MarletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Panzica v. GalassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Panzica v. GalassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boucher v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Fischer v. LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Newman v. MichelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- E & J Holding Corp. v. NotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Veach v. DayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.