Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Marcinek

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 9, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 353, is granted, limited to the following question:

“In the circumstances of this case, was the plaintiff entitled to rescission and restitution relating to rescission because of the defendants’ failure to disclose the existence of a service station in violation of General Statutes §§ 22a-134 or 22a-134a or applicable administrative regulations?”

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Diamond v. MarcinekConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diamond v. MarcinekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Holly Hill Holdings v. LowmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993