Legal Opinion

Cravens L. Wanlass, Energystics, Inc. And Wanlass International, Inc. v. General Electric Company

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 10, 1998No. 97-1425Published

1Opinion of the Court

148 F.3d 1334

46 U.S.P.Q.2d 1915

Cravens L. WANLASS, Energystics, Inc. and Wanlass

International, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-1425.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

June 8, 1998.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc

Declined Aug. 10, 1998.*

Robert M. Taylor, Jr., Lyon & Lyon, LLP Costa Mesa, CA, argued, for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on brief were Robert E. Lyon, James H. Shalek, and Charles C. Fowler.

Robert B. Breisblatt, Welsh & Katz, LTD., Chicago, IL, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on brief were A.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Gasser Chair Company, Inc., and George Gasser v. Infanti Chair Manufacturing Corp., and Vittorio InfantiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API