Legal Opinion

United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1923No. 4080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

The complaint in this case contains 18 causes of action, each cause of action charging a violation of the Safety Appliance Act and the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission made and issued pursuant thereto. The answer of the defendant admitted the interstate character of its business and denied each and every other allegation of the complaint. By way of an affirmative defense, but not as a defense to any particular cause of action, the answer averred that on the 1st day of July, 1922, the joint shop craft employees of the railway company, including those engaged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & O. S. W. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  2. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  3. United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. Spokane International Ry. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1928
  5. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API