Reynolds International Pen Co. v. Eversharp, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
The affidavits in support of the motion for preliminary injunction charge that defendants have falsely asserted that their two Biro patents cover all ball-bearing pens and that anyone who makes and vends such a pen infringes. Plaintiff contends the ball-pointed pen is old in the art (circa 1888) and defendants’ patents cover merely containers, springs, plungers, pistons, etc.— useful in a ball-pointed pen — and that the patents cannot cover the ball-pointed pen itself. Jurisdiction and immediate injunc-tive relief are based upon threats made by defendants to retailers…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. GittoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Murray Hill Restaurant, Inc. v. Thirteen Twenty One Locust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Weirton Steel Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1934
- Hand v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Henis v. Compania Agricola De GuatemalaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Clifton Park Manor, Section One, Inc. v. MasonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Raitport v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Sneider v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.