Legal Opinion

Plum v. Indian Valley Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1931No. Docket No. 4394PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The complaint in this action alleges that on certain dates mentioned therein, the plaintiff deposited certain sums of money with the defendant, a banking corporation, aggregating in all the sum of $1,060.10, and that there was due and unpaid from the defendant to the plaintiff, said sum, for which judgment was asked. The answer of the defendant denied the allegations of the complaint.

The court found that the allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint were untrue, and further found as follows: “The o'jurt finds from the evidence that the sums of money referred to and specified in paragraph II of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People ex rel. Carrillo v. De la GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. James v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Popcorn Equipment Co. v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Covina Union High School District v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Gosnell v. GosnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Aponte & Sobrino v. Sucesión de Pérez LleraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API